Picture found at www.fasttrackteaching.comWhat are the powers given to the National Government? What are the powers given to the States? Do they have powers that overlap?
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
This is a direct quote from the United States Constitution, and it basically says that each state in our country is guaranteed its own government. The states have certain things that they can control; powers entirely different from the powers of the federal government. This is a way to make sure all the power doesn’t fall to just one place, because if there are smaller governments inside a larger one, then the larger one would have more opposition if it tried to take over everything. In theory, the federal government was to stick to its business, and the states were to stick to theirs.
But it doesn’t always work that way. If a state makes a fully constitutional law that conflicts with a fully constitutional federal law, then the federal law overrules the state law. The Supreme Court can also decide that something would be better suited as a power that the federal government has control over.
These days, since the people expect so much from the government, the federal government has far more power than they did at the start. This is an extremely bad idea because if more and more power is given to the federal government, than that would have a possibility of encroaching on our rights. How can a government somewhere else really know what would be best for people in each individual state if they’re not there? If the federal government gets all the control over what can happen in each state than nothing good can come of it.
Often, the federal government can bribe the state governments to create laws. For example, when they use highway funds to bribe states to make the speed limits similar in each state; if the states did not comply, then they didn’t get the funds. The federal government needs to bribe the states in some cases, because the federal government cannot pass laws on the issues that each individual state has charge of. I think that in a way, federalism is slightly flawed because the federal government still has the power to influence the states in issues that they should have no control over. If the federal government can influence the state governments, then in a worst case scenario, the state governments will simply be there to keep the people happy, but the real power would all be in the federal government. I think that a possible way to make sure this doesn’t happen is to take away the federal government’s ability to bribe. For instance, if there was a set amount of funding that could be given to each state, and if they amount was regulated so that it was fair. Our states should not be influenced by people who know nothing about the culture in each different state, they should be controlled by those who actually live there, and who know what is needed to improve things for the citizens.
You can find a video describing how the state and federal governments divide and share power here.
1 comment:
If the federal government has a way to bribe, does this mean we actually have a fair system or is it all just a way to look like we have seperated the power?
Post a Comment